<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
		<rss version="2.0">
		  <channel>
				<title><![CDATA[The Mindful Network - Articles - ]]></title>
				<link>http://www.refresher.com/mindfulnetwork/articlelive</link>
				<description />
				<language>en-us</language>
				<copyright><![CDATA[http://www.refresher.com/mindfulnetwork/articlelive]]></copyright>
				<generator>N/A</generator>
				<webMaster>vfr@sympatico.ca</webMaster>
				<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:47:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>
			
				<ttl>20</ttl>

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Thinking Responsibly]]></title>
					  <link>http://www.refresher.com/mindfulnetwork/articlelive/articles/103/1/Thinking-Responsibly/Page1.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[&#8220;Drink responsibly,&#8221; reads the ad for a Kentucky whiskey. But the big headline and alluring photos in the advertisement scream &#8220;buy our product&#8221; and imply they want us to drink it. Do they fear they may get sued if customers get loaded and hurt themselves or others so they add this message to protect themselves? Does it serve as a sort of disclaimer? Or are they good corporate citizens concerned that people will overindulge unless they include the admonition? Admonition or disclaimer, the words remind me that some of us are not responsible in the way we consume. And it applies to many things not just alcohol.]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (John Renesch)</author>
					  <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:36:32 EDT</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.refresher.com/mindfulnetwork/articlelive/articles/103/1/Thinking-Responsibly/Page1.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Living in a Tabloid Headspace]]></title>
					  <link>http://www.refresher.com/mindfulnetwork/articlelive/articles/80/1/Living-in-a-Tabloid-Headspace/Page1.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[<strong>Our Preoccupation With Trivia</strong><br/>&nbsp;<br/>The other day I came across a podcast entitled &#8220;Attention: The &#8216;Real&#8217; Aphrodisiac.&#8221; I learned of a phrase apparently coined by former Microsoft VP Linda Stone: &#8220;Continuous Partial Attention.&#8221; It describes&nbsp;that &#8220;always on&#8221; way many people operate, not only in their work lives but their private lives as well. ]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (John Renesch)</author>
					  <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 19:51:14 EDT</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.refresher.com/mindfulnetwork/articlelive/articles/80/1/Living-in-a-Tabloid-Headspace/Page1.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Doing the Right Thing]]></title>
					  <link>http://www.refresher.com/mindfulnetwork/articlelive/articles/25/1/Doing-the-Right-Thing/Page1.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[I hear it almost every day: &#8220;It was the right thing to do.&#8221; But how often is this heard in the average corporate environment? In most corporate cultures the normal attitude &#8211; even if unstated - is &#8220;it was the <i>smart</i> thing to do&#8221; which usually means it was politically expedient. In this context, &#8220;smart&#8221; means one played it safe, didn&#8217;t stick their neck out very far and most of his/her peers agreed it was a wise decision. Imagine a corporate culture in which the everyday decisions and choices are not only viewed as &#8220;politically smart&#8221; but as &#8220;the right thing to do&#8221; &#8211; that is they are both moral and ethical, regardless of the potential political fall-out. Wouldn&#8217;t that be refreshing? ]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (John Renesch)</author>
					  <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:31:53 EST</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.refresher.com/mindfulnetwork/articlelive/articles/25/1/Doing-the-Right-Thing/Page1.html</guid>
					</item>

				
				  </channel>
				</rss>
			